Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleAdult Brain
Open Access

Paracoccidioidomycosis of the Central Nervous System: CT and MR Imaging Findings

M. Rosa Júnior, A.C. Amorim, I.V. Baldon, L.A. Martins, R.M. Pereira, R.P. Campos, S.S. Gonçalves, T.R.G. Velloso, P. Peçanha and A. Falqueto
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2019, 40 (10) 1681-1688; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6203
M. Rosa Júnior
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (M.R.J.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Rosa Júnior
A.C. Amorim
bRadiology (A.C.A., I.V.B., L.A.M., R.M.P.), Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antônio de Moraes da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, HUCAM/UFES/EBSERH, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A.C. Amorim
I.V. Baldon
bRadiology (A.C.A., I.V.B., L.A.M., R.M.P.), Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antônio de Moraes da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, HUCAM/UFES/EBSERH, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for I.V. Baldon
L.A. Martins
bRadiology (A.C.A., I.V.B., L.A.M., R.M.P.), Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antônio de Moraes da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, HUCAM/UFES/EBSERH, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for L.A. Martins
R.M. Pereira
bRadiology (A.C.A., I.V.B., L.A.M., R.M.P.), Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antônio de Moraes da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, HUCAM/UFES/EBSERH, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R.M. Pereira
R.P. Campos
cDepartment of Neuroradiology (R.P.C.), Hospital Meridional, Cariacica, Espírito Santo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R.P. Campos
S.S. Gonçalves
dDepartments of Pathology (S.S.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S.S. Gonçalves
T.R.G. Velloso
eClinical Dentistry (T.R.G.V.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T.R.G. Velloso
P. Peçanha
fInfectious Disease (P.P., A.F.), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P. Peçanha
A. Falqueto
fInfectious Disease (P.P., A.F.), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Falqueto
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Paracoccidioidomycosis is a fungal infection mainly caused by the thermodimorphic fungus Paracoccidioides. The purpose of our study was to demonstrate the neuroimaging findings from 24 patients with CNS paracoccidioidomycosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis focusing on the radiologic characteristics of CNS paracoccidioidomycosis. The 24 selected patients underwent MR imaging and/or CT, and the diagnosis was made by the presence of typical neuroimaging features, combined with fungus isolation, a serologic test, or the presence of disseminated disease.

RESULTS: Headache was the most common neurologic symptom, while the pseudotumoral form was the most common pattern. The number of lesions ranged from 1 to 11, with most localized on the frontal lobe with >2-cm lesions. CT showed mainly hypoattenuating lesions, whereas MR imaging demonstrated mainly hyposignal lesions on T1WI and T2WI. Furthermore, ring enhancement was present in most patients. The “dual rim sign” on SWI occurred in 100% of our patients with lesions of >2 cm.

CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of CNS paracoccidioidomycosis is difficult. Nevertheless, imaging examinations can play an important role in the diagnosis and evaluation of the disease.

ABBREVIATIONS:

PCM
paracoccidioidomycosis
CT
computed tomography
MRI
magnetic resonance imaging
CNS
central nervous system
DSC
dynamic susceptibility contrast
DCE
dynamic contrast enhanced
rCBV
relative cerebral blood volume
Gd
gadolinium

Paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM) is a fungal infection, which is endemic in Latin America and is mainly caused by the thermodimorphic fungus Paracoccidioides spp, which primarily attacks the lungs and has a potential to disseminate to other organs.1 Recently described are 4 other species of the genus Para-coccidioides apart from P brasiliensis: P lutzii, P restrepiensis, P venezuelensis, and P Americana.2,3

Paracoccidioides spp inhabits primarily the soil and causes autochthonous infection from southern Mexico to northern Argentina.4⇓–6 Most reported cases (approximately 80%) are from Brazil, and the rest are mainly from Venezuela, Colombia, and Argentina.6⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–14

The criterion standard for the diagnosis of PCM consists of demonstrating the presence of the fungus as multiple budding cells in clinical or tissue specimens. Nevertheless, serologic tests and imaging examinations such as CT, MR imaging, and x-rays also play an important role in the diagnosis and evaluation of the disease.1,5⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–17

CNS involvement is more common than it was once believed, and the disease can affect the CNS, ranging from 1% to 27.27% of cases.18⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–25 Although the brain form of PCM is usually an outcome of hematogenous or lymphatic dissemination of a primary focus, it is not necessarily followed by disseminated PCM; in a few cases, it is the only location of the fungus in the body.26

Our purpose was to describe the clinical and radiologic data (CT and MR imaging) of 24 patients diagnosed with CNS PCM between 1978 and 2019. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest imaging study of CNS PCM.

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective study, focusing on the radiologic characteristics of patients with CNS PCM attending the University Hospital Cassiano Antônio de Moraes, Federal University of Espirito Santo, between 1978 to 2019. The 24 selected patients had MR imaging and/or CT scans, and the diagnosis was made by the presence of typical neuroimaging features, combined with fungus isolation, a serologic test, or the presence of disseminated disease.

The CT scans were performed with Aquilion ONE 64-slice (Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) or Asteion single-section (Toshiba Medical Systems) scanners. Patients were studied with 1-, 5-, or 10-mm axial slices before and/or after administration of an intravenous iodinated contrast agent in a peripheral vein at a total dose of 1.5 mL/kg. Fourteen patients underwent CT before and after contrast, and 3 patients, without contrast administration.

The MR images were obtained in a 1.5T Achieva (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) or a 1.5T Brivo (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin), with a specific head coil model with 8 channels, with T1-weighted, T2-weighted, FLAIR, DWI, T2*, and T1 postcontrast images. Intravenous administration of 0.1 mmol/kg of gadolinium-based contrast agent through the antecubital vein was performed for all patients. The MR imaging parameters were the following—Achieva: T1-weighted: TR = 547.8–623 ms, TE = 12.8–15 ms, section thickness = 5.0 mm, matrix = 528 × 528–328 × 271; T2-weighted: TR = 4572.5–4631 ms, TE = 100 ms, section thickness = 5.0 mm, matrix = 704 × 704–328 × 253; FLAIR: TR = 11,000 ms, TE = 140 ms, TI = 2800, section thickness = 5.0 mm, matrix = 640 × 640–256 × 156; DWI: TR = 4583–6596.3 ms, TE = 79–88.2 ms, section thickness = 3.5 mm, matrix = 512 × 512–192 × 114; T2*: TR = 588–609 ms, TE = 13.8 ms, section thickness = 5.0 mm, matrix = 512 × 512–232 × 183; SWI: TR = 22.6 ms, TE = 32.5 ms, section thickness = 2.0 mm, matrix = 448 × 448; T1 3D saggital postcontrast fast-field echo: TR = 12.4 ms, TE = 5946 ms, section thickness = 1 mm, matrix = 288 × 288; Brivo: T1-weighted: TR = 728 ms, TE = 3 ms, section thickness = 5.5 mm, matrix = 416 × 192; T2-weighted: TR = 3625 ms, TE = 122 ms, section thickness = 4.5 mm, matrix = 416 × 192; DWI: TR = 7309 ms, TE = 117 ms, section thickness = 4.5 mm, matrix = 128 × 128; T2*: TR = 434 ms, TE = 15.8 ms, section thickness = 4.5 mm, matrix = 320 × 224; FLAIR: TR = 10,000 ms, TE = 110 ms, section thickness = 4.5 mm, matrix = 288 × 192; T1 3D saggital postcontrast: TR = 7.9 ms, TE = 2.6 ms, section thickness = 2.0 mm, matrix = 288 × 224.

Five patients also underwent SWI, 2 patients underwent perfusion DSC and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, and 2 patients underwent spectroscopy studies, only with qualitative analyses.

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging

A power injector was used to administer a bolus of gadolinium-based contrast agent at a dose of 0.05 mmol/kg and rate of 5 mL/s. The kinetic enhancement of tissue before and after contrast injection was obtained using a 3D-T1-weighted fast-spoiled gradient-echo sequence (TR = 5.5 ms, TE = 1.3 ms, section thickness = 5 mm, flip angle = 12°, FOV = 240 × 177 × 125 cm, matrix = 108 × 100) and consisted of 25 images in the axial plane. Ten phases for preinjection time delay and 30 phases for postinjection were obtained.

DSC-PWI was performed with a gradient-recalled T2*-weighted echo-planar imaging sequence. The imaging parameters were as follows: TR/TE = 2085/40 ms, flip angle = 75°, section thickness = 5 mm, intersection gap = 0.5 mm, NEX = 1.0, FOV = 240 × 240 mm. During the first 3 phases, images were acquired before injecting the contrast material to establish a baseline. When the scan was in the fourth phase of DSC-PWI, a bolus of gadolinium-based contrast agent at a dose of 0.25 mmol/kg of body weight and 5 mL/s was injected intravenously with an MR imaging–compatible power injector. After we injected a bolus of the contrast material, a 20.0-mL bolus of saline was administered at the same injection rate. The series had 25 sections with 60 phases.

Single-voxel spectroscopy was ac-quired encompassing the annular enhancement area and the center nonenhancement area after contrast administration with the following parameters: point-resolved spectroscopy sequence, axial acquisition plane, TE = 35 and 144 ms, TR = 541 ms, number of acquisitions = 64, spectral resolution = 4096 points, voxel size = 8 cm3 (2 × 2 × 2 cm).

We evaluated the following findings on head CT scans: density, the presence of calcifications, hydrocephalus, hemorrhage, perilesional edema, topography, number and size of lesions, and the contrast-enhancement pattern. We evaluated the following on MR imaging: T1 and T2 signals and diffusion, perfusion, and spectroscopy findings.

Similar to Toh et al,27 who studied the “dual rim sign” on SWI in pyogenic abscesses, we also evaluated patients with SWI sequences for the presence of the dual rim sign, which is defined as 2 concentric rims around the central cavities at the margins of lesions, with the outer rim being hypointense, and the inner rim, hyperintense relative to the cavity contents. All imaging findings were assessed by 1 neuroradiologist with 8 years of experience. In addition, the clinical symptoms were accessed through systematic chart review.

Furthermore, the study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Clinical Research of the University Hospital Cassiano Antônio de Moraes, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Espirito Santo, Brazil.

Results

We describe 24 patients with a diagnosis of CNS PCM. All patients were men, ranging from 19 to 66 years of age. Approximately half of the patients were between 40 and 59 years of age. Headache was the most common neurologic symptom and was present in 33.3% of the cases. The epidemiology and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics

Twenty-one patients had the pseudotumoral form, defined by the presence of parenchymal lesions with annular or nodular enhancement, while the meningeal pattern was observed in 1 case, and the combined form, in 2 cases. None of the patients had calcifications at the time of the initial neuroimaging. Perilesional edema was present in 90.4% of cases, whereas hydrocephalus and hemorrhage were found in 25% and 13% of cases, respectively. The number of lesions observed in each patient ranged from 1 to 11, with a mean of 3. Eleven patients had between 2 and 5 lesions (Table 2). Most were localized in the frontal lobe (37.5%), followed by the cerebellum (33.3%), parietal lobe (29.1%), occipital lobe (25%), and thalamus (20.8%) (Table 3). Furthermore, 65.2% of the lesions had an axial diameter of >2 cm, and the larger axial diameter of the major lesion ranged from 0.3 to 5.6 cm (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

CT findings

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Lesion sites

Seventeen patients had CT scans showing a total of 53 lesions, of which 56.6% were hypoattenuating, 20.7% were hyperattenuating, and 22.6% had a hypoattenuating center with a hyperattenuating margin (Table 2 and Fig 1). On the other hand, 19 patients underwent MR imaging, in which a total of 61 lesions were observed. The T1-weighted sequence demonstrated that 50.8% were hypointense, 34.4% were hyperintense, and 14.7% were heterogeneous with a hypointense center with a hyperintense margin (Fig 2). On the T2-weighted sequence, 59% were hypointense, 9.8% were hyperintense, and 31.1% had heterogeneous lesions (hyperintense + hypointense) (Fig 3). Restricted diffusion was present in 47.3% (Fig 4), and the target sign was observed in 1 patient (5.2%). Ring contrast enhancement was observed in 70.8%; nodular enhancement, in 12.5%; both ring and nodular enhancement, in 12.5%; and leptomeningeal enhancement, in 4.1% of the cases (Table 3 and Fig 5). Moreover, 3 patients underwent MR perfusion imaging, and 2 underwent proton spectroscopy. The perfusion demonstrated decreased relative CBV on DSC and slow and progressive ascending perfusion on dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging in all 3 patients (Fig 6). The spectroscopy demonstrated an increase of lipids and choline in both patients (Table 4 and Fig 7). Of the 5 patients in whom the SWI sequence was performed, 4 showed the dual rim sign on SWI (Fig 8). The patient who did not show the dual rim signal on SWI had a lesion <2 cm.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Brain CT showing different presentations of the lesions. A, Hypoattenuating lesions. B, Hypoattenuating lesions with a hyperattenuating halo. C, Hyperattenuating lesions.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Signal on the T1-weighted images: hypointense lesion (A), lesion with hypointense center and hyperintense halo (B), and hyperintense lesion (C).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

T2-weighted images show a hypointense lesion (A), a heterogeneous signal (B), and a hyperintense lesion (C).

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Demonstration that the lesions may not present with diffusion restriction (A) or diffusion restriction (B) with a low signal on the ADC map (C).

Fig 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5.

T1-weighted images after contrast administration demonstrating a small nodule in the cortical-subcortical transition (A), nodular lesion with annular enhancement (B), and multiple nodular lesions with annular enhancement and “daughter cysts” in a complex heterogeneous mass (C).

Fig 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 6.

T2-weighted perfusion shows a lesion with low perfusion (A). T1-weighted perfusion shows the blood-brain barrier breakdown (B).

Fig 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 7.

Proton spectroscopy with a TE = 144 ms showing increased lipid and choline peaks, with decreased NAA peaks.

Fig 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 8.

SWI sequence showing the dual rim sign. Note the external hypointense halo with an internal hyperintense halo.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4:

MR imaging findings

Thoracic imaging revealed that all patients presented with thoracic lesions in the form of pulmonary nodules, ground-glass opacities, consolidations, reversed halo sign, bronchiectasis, or lymph node enlargement.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this study presents the largest imaging case series of CNS PCM until now (Fig 9). We describe the neuroimaging findings from 24 patients who were treated in a reference hospital in the State of Espirito Santo.

Fig 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 9.

Laboratory diagnosis of paracoccidioidomycosis. Fresh examination in Parker-KOH stain shows yeast cells with multiple buds (A). Cultivation of Paracoccidioides spp. Left, yeast colonies to 37°C; and right, filamentous colonies to 25°C (B).

Peçanha et al28 analyzed 546 patients in a reference hospital from 1978 to 2012 presenting with PCM. The historical case series revealed the involvement of the CNS in 4.5% (22 patients) with the chronic form and 3.3% (2 patients) with the acute/subacute form.

The main patterns of CNS PCM described are the pseudotumoral (90%) and meningeal (10%) forms.19⇓–21,29 Moreover, meningitis associated with the pseudotumoral form may occur in 17% of cases, or more rarely, it can be an isolated finding.19 In our study, we also observed the predominance of the pseudotumoral form (87.5%), while the meningeal form was observed in 4.1%, and the combined form, in 8.3% of the cases.

The meningeal form is characterized by inflammation of the leptomeninges or pachymeninges, generally in the base of the skull, similar to what is observed in tuberculosis meningitis.18,29⇓⇓⇓–33 It may be diffuse or localized, isolated, or with dissemination to the parenchyma or nervous roots.

On the other hand, the pseudotumoral form consists of intraparenchymal granulomas, involving both the supratentorial and infratentorial compartments, which may mimic primary tumors, metastases, pyogenic abscesses, or viral and fungal etiologies.20,34 The granulomas are frequently irregular (76%), ranging from 10 to 45 mm, with mass effect, peripheral enhancement by contrast, and perilesional edema in 82% of the cases.20,29,32 In our study, 65.2% of the patients had a granuloma larger than 2.0 cm; the mean diameter of the larger lesion was 2.3 cm with the range 0.3–5.6 cm, showing the same irregularity described in other studies. Similar to the studies described in the medical literature, perilesional edema was present in 90.4% of our patients.

The lesion can be situated in the cerebral hemispheres (67%), cerebellum (25%), brain stem (25%), and spinal cord (4%).19,20 In our study, 62.5% of patients had lesions in the cerebral hemispheres; 33.3%, in the cerebellum; and 8.3%, in the brain stem; and no patient had a spinal cord lesion. Gasparetto et al20 demonstrated that 47% of patients had a singular granuloma, 23% had 2 lesions, and 30% had ≥3 lesions. In our study, we observed a frequency similar to that of Gasparetto et al; 40.9% of the patients had a single granuloma. The mean number of lesions was 3, and the range was 1–11.

The location of the lesions determines the signals and symptoms in the patients.29,35 The 5 most frequent symptoms were epilepsy, hemiparesis, cerebellar signs, headache, and hydrocephalus.19,32 In our patients, the most common symptom was headache, followed by epilepsy.

The pseudotumoral form can assume a compact granulomatous pattern, which is completely solid, or it can have a necrotic center that explains the findings in the MR images. In addition, granulomas do not infiltrate or spread to the adjacent tissue.20 Therefore, necrotic lesions in PCM may resemble pyogenic abscesses, and proton MR imaging with spectroscopy being a noninvasive technique can help distinguish the lesions.36,37 Similar to Reis et al,33 we found a high peak of the lipids and choline in all cases.

MR images show the pseudotumoral lesions consist of variable, hypo- or hyperintense lesions in T1 and T2 sequences. In particular, Reis et al33 described the presence of a peripheral hyperintense halo in the T1 sequences without contrast in all 8 patients who were included in their research. In our study, this finding was in only 14.7%, demonstrating that it is not as frequent as reported in the above study.

Due to the variability of the composition of a granuloma, the diffusion-weighted sequence may exhibit lesions with or without restriction of water molecules. In our cases, 47.3% of patients had restriction on the diffusion imaging, showing variability as is described.

Similar to Toh et al,27 who found the dual rim sign on SWI in 9 of 12 patients with pyogenic abscesses, we found this sign in all our 4 patients who presented with lesions >2 cm and underwent the SWI sequence, showing that this sign is not specific for pyogenic abscess. The contrast-enhancing rim of bacterial brain abscesses on MR imaging corresponds to the abscess capsule, and the magnetic susceptibility results from the free radicals produced by macrophages. There are a necrotic center and a zone of granulation tissue between the fibrocollagenous capsule and the center of the abscesses. With image coregistration, Toh et al27 speculated that the hyperintense rims probably represent granulation tissue in pyogenic abscesses. We think this finding, the dual rim, occurs because PCM is also an infection. We suspect that this signal may occur in other infections, not only in bacterial abscesses as initially described by Toh et al. Because an antifungal is the treatment form, histopathologic examination of the margins may not be available in most cases. Thus, this finding is limited by a lack of direct histopathologic correlation with SWI findings, making it difficult to precisely define its origin.

CT images of the pseudotumoral form usually show hypoattenuating lesions with ring enhancement after contrast administration and surrounding edema. Calcifications or septations within the lesions might occur in up to 20% of cases.20 With time, pseudotumoral CNS PCM gradually becomes more attenuating in noncontrast tomography and progressively becomes smaller.20

PCM shows a typical granulomatous reaction consisting of multinucleated giant cells mixed with extensive interstitial and conglomerate fibrosis, necrosis, and arterial intimal fibrosis. It subsequently may develop a central area of necrosis, and this may explain the heterogeneous image pattern. The central area of necrosis is initially solid and later may liquefy. On CT, the solid granuloma, without necrosis, may present as isoattenuated or slightly hyperattenuated to the brain parenchyma. On MR imaging, it is hypointense on both T1- and T2WI. The heterogeneity of imaging findings show homogeneous enhancement on postcontrast images. Because the granuloma shows necrosis of its central portion, the images show hypoattenuated lesions on CT, hyperintense on T2WI, with ring enhancement on postcontrast images. Liquid necrotic lesions show restricted diffusion, whereas solid necrotic lesions do not have restriction of diffusion.15,20,33

Similar to Reis et al,33 all our cases presented with thoracic lesions. Gasparetto et al20 also found thoracic alterations in most patients (88%), a finding that may help in the differential diagnosis.

This study has limitations. Few patients were studied with advanced MR imaging methods like DSC, dynamic contrast-enhancement, spectroscopy, and SWI, with only qualitative analyses, but it paves the way for new studies in the area that may contribute to additional findings in this disease.

Conclusions

CNS involvement has a variable frequency rate in PCM, and an increase in reports has been observed in recent years.19,26 The diagnosis of PCM in the CNS is difficult because of the low sensitivity of diagnostic tests, the isolated forms of PCM in the CNS, the absence of previous systemic infection, and nonspecific symptoms that may be confused with other entities. Nevertheless, imaging examinations though nonspecific, when combined with the epidemiology and clinical manifestations, can play an important role in the diagnosis and evaluation of the disease. Therefore, it should be considered as a differential diagnosis for expansive lesions in the brain or meningitis, particularly in endemic areas.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kwon-Chung KJ,
    2. Bennett JE
    . Medical mycology. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 1992;34:504–04 doi:10.1590/S0036-46651992000600018
    CrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Marques-da-Silva SH,
    2. Rodrigues AM,
    3. de Hoog GS, et al
    . Occurrence of Paracoccidioides lutzii in the Amazon region: description of two cases. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2012;87:710–14 doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0340 pmid:22927496
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Turissini DA,
    2. Gomez OM,
    3. Teixeira MM, et al
    . Species boundaries in the human pathogen Paracoccidioides. Fungal Genet Biol 2017;106:9–25 doi:10.1016/j.fgb.2017.05.007 pmid:28602831
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bagagli E,
    2. Theodoro RC,
    3. Bosco SM, et al
    . Paracoccidioides brasiliensis: phylogenetic and ecological aspects. Mycopathologia 2008;165:197–207 doi:10.1007/s11046-007-9050-7 pmid:18777629
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Terçarioli GR,
    2. Bagagli E,
    3. Reis GM
    . Ecological study of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis in soil: growth ability, conidia production and molecular detection. BMC Microbiol 2007;7:92 doi:10.1186/1471-2180-7-92 pmid:17953742
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Wanke B,
    2. Aide MA
    . Chapter 6: paracoccidioidomycosis. J Bras Pneumol 2009;35:1245–49 doi:10.1590/S1806-37132009001200013 pmid:20126928
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Coutinho ZF,
    2. Silva D,
    3. Lazera M, et al
    . Paracoccidioidomycosis mortality in Brazil (1980-1995). Cad Saúde Pública 2002;18:1441–54 doi:10.1590/S0102-311X2002000500037 pmid:12244377
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Ajello L,
    2. Polonelli L
    . Imported paracoccidioidomycosis: a public health problem in non-endemic areas. Eur J Epidemiol 1985;1:160–65 doi:10.1007/BF00234089 pmid:3842116
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kamei K,
    2. Sano A,
    3. Kikuchi K, et al
    . The trend of imported mycoses in Japan. J Infect Chemother 2003;9:16–20 doi:10.1007/s10156-002-0217-3 pmid:12673401
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Buitrago MJ,
    2. Cuenca-Estrella M
    . Current epidemiology and laboratory diagnosis of endemic mycoses in Spain [in Spanish]. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2012;30:407–13 doi:10.1016/j.eimc.2011.09.014 pmid:22130575
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Laccourreye O,
    2. Mirghani H,
    3. Brasnu D, et al
    . Imported acute and isolated glottic paracoccidioidomycosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2010;119:89–92 doi:10.1177/000348941011900204 pmid:20336918
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Onda H,
    2. Komine M,
    3. Murata S, et al
    . Letter: imported paracoccidioidomycosis in Japan. Dermatol Online J 2011;17:11 pmid:20336918
    PubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Van Damme PA,
    2. Bierenbroodspot F,
    3. Telgtt DS, et al
    . A case of imported paracoccidioidomycosis: an awkward infection in the Netherlands. Med Mycol 2006;44:13–18 doi:10.1080/13693780500148137 pmid:16805088
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Walker SL,
    2. Pembroke AC,
    3. Lucas SB, et al
    . Paracoccidioidomycosis presenting in the U.K. Br J Dermatol 2007;158:624–26 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08346.x pmid:18067474
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Rosa Junior M,
    2. Baldon IV,
    3. Amorim AFC, et al
    . Imaging paracoccidioidomycosis: a pictorial review from head to toe. Eur J Radiol 2018;103:147–62 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.03.026 pmid:29685479
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Martinez R
    . Epidemiology of paracoccidioidomycosis. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 2015;57:11–20 doi:10.1590/S0036-46652015000700004 pmid:26465364
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Benard G
    . An overview of the immunopathology of human paracoccidioidomycosis. Mycopathologia 2008;165:209–21 doi:10.1007/s11046-007-9065-0 pmid:18777630
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Finamor LP,
    2. Muccioli C,
    3. Martins MC, et al
    . Ocular and central nervous system paracoccidioidomycosis in a pregnant woman with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;134:456–59 doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01574-X pmid:12208267
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. de Almeida SM,
    2. Queiroz-Telles F,
    3. Teive HA, et al
    . Central nervous system paracoccidioidomycosis: clinical features and laboratorial findings. J Infect 2004;48:193–98 doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2003.08.012 pmid:14720496
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Gasparetto EL,
    2. Liu CB,
    3. de Carvalho Neto A, et al
    . Central nervous system paracoccidioidomycosis: imaging findings in 17 cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003;27:12–17 doi:10.1097/00004728-200301000-00003 pmid:12544236
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Magalhaes AC,
    2. Bacheschi LA,
    3. Caramelli P, et al
    . Paracoccidioidomycosis of the central nervous system: study of 5 cases by magnetic resonance [in Portuguese]. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 1993;48:94–97 pmid:8235281
    PubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Duarte AL,
    2. Baruffa G,
    3. Terra HB, et al
    . Systemic paracoccidioidomycosis with central nervous system involvement [in Portuguese]. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 1999;32:439–42 doi:10.1590/S0037-86821999000400015 pmid:10495674
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Correa RB,
    2. Puccioni-Sohler M,
    3. Artemenko SR, et al
    . An uncommon neurologic presentation in the course of paracoccidioidomycosis: report of a case [in Portuguese]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 1991;49:456–59 doi:10.1590/S0004-282X1991000400016 pmid:1842196
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. de Moura LP,
    2. Raffin CN,
    3. del Negro GM, et al
    . Paracoccidioidomycosis evidencing spinal cord involvement treated with success by fluconazole [in Portuguese]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 1994;52:82–86 doi:10.1590/S0004-282X1994000100015 pmid:8002815
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Pereira WC,
    2. Tenuto RA,
    3. Raphael A, et al
    . Brain localization of South American blastomycosis: considerations apropos of 9 cases [in Portuguese]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 1965;23:113–26 doi:10.1590/S0004-282X1965000200006 pmid:5851892
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. de Almeida SM
    . Central nervous system paracoccidioidomycosis: an overview. Braz J Infect Dis 2005;9:126–33 doi:10.1590/S1413-86702005000200002 pmid:16127588
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Toh CH,
    2. Wei KC,
    3. Chang CN, et al
    . Differentiation of pyogenic brain abscesses from necrotic glioblastomas with use of susceptibility-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1534–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2986 pmid:22422181
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Peçanha PM,
    2. Batista Ferreira ME,
    3. Massaroni PM, et al
    . Paracoccidioidomycosis: epidemiological and clinical aspects in 546 cases studied in the state of Espirito Santo, Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2017;97:836–44 doi:10.4269/ajtmh.16-0790 pmid:28749757
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Elias J Jr.,
    2. dos Santos AC,
    3. Carlotti CG Jr., et al
    . Central nervous system paracoccidioidomycosis: diagnosis and treatment. Surg Neurol 2005;63(Suppl 1):S13–21; discussion S21 doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2004.09.019 pmid:15629337
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Pedro RDJ,
    2. Branchini ML,
    3. de Lucca RS, et al
    . Paracoccidioidomycosis of the central nervous system: apropos of 2 cases [in Portuguese]. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 1980;22:269–74 pmid:7209279
    PubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Lorenzoni PJ,
    2. Chang MR,
    3. Paniago AM, et al
    . Paracoccidioidomycosis meningitis: case report [in Portuguese]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2002;60:1015–18 doi:10.1590/S0004-282X2002000600025 pmid:12563399
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Francesconi F,
    2. Francesconi do Valle AC,
    3. Silva MT, et al
    . International issues: meningoencephalitis due to Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. Neurology 2008;71:e65–67 doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000335266.60637.c3 pmid:19015480
    FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Reis F,
    2. Collier PP,
    3. Souza TF, et al
    . Neuroparacoccidioidomycosis (NPCM): magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. Myco-pathologia 2013;175:181–86 doi:10.1007/s11046-012-9607-y pmid:23229616
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Rodacki MA,
    2. De Toni G,
    3. Borba LA, et al
    . Paracoccidioidomycosis of the central nervous system: CT findings. Neuroradiology 1995;37:636–41 doi:10.1007/BF00593377 pmid:8748894
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Teive HA,
    2. Zanatta A,
    3. Germiniani FM, et al
    . Holmes' tremor and neuroparacoccidioidomycosis: a case report. Mov Disord 2002;17:1392–94 doi:10.1002/mds.10277 pmid:12465094
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Faria AV,
    2. Dabus GC,
    3. Zanardi VA, et al
    . Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging findings in a patient with central nervous system paracoccidioidomycosis. J Neuroimaging 2004;14:377–79 doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2004.tb00268.x pmid:15358962
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Magalhaes AC,
    2. Caramelli P,
    3. Silva ED, et al
    . Magnetic resonance imaging in intracranial paracoccidioidomycosis. J Neuroimaging 1993;3:216–19 doi:10.1111/jon199334216 pmid:10146412
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received June 19, 2019.
  • Accepted after revision July 25, 2019.
  • © 2019 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 40 (10)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 40, Issue 10
1 Oct 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Paracoccidioidomycosis of the Central Nervous System: CT and MR Imaging Findings
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
M. Rosa Júnior, A.C. Amorim, I.V. Baldon, L.A. Martins, R.M. Pereira, R.P. Campos, S.S. Gonçalves, T.R.G. Velloso, P. Peçanha, A. Falqueto
Paracoccidioidomycosis of the Central Nervous System: CT and MR Imaging Findings
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2019, 40 (10) 1681-1688; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6203

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Paracoccidioidomycosis of the Central Nervous System: CT and MR Imaging Findings
M. Rosa Júnior, A.C. Amorim, I.V. Baldon, L.A. Martins, R.M. Pereira, R.P. Campos, S.S. Gonçalves, T.R.G. Velloso, P. Peçanha, A. Falqueto
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2019, 40 (10) 1681-1688; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6203
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (4)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Paracoccidioidomycosis cases by Paracoccidioides lutzii in southeastern Brazil
    Wdson Luis Lima Kruschewsky, Suzana Alves Patricio, Isabela Cruz Bahiense, Simone Bravim Maifrede, Ana Paula Pôssa, Zoilo Pires de Camargo, Anderson Messias Rodrigues, Paulo Mendes Peçanha, Aloísio Falqueto, Tânia Regina Grão-Velloso, Sarah Santos Gonçalves
    Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 2023 54 3
  • A Case of Neuroparacoccidioidomycosis in Houston, Texas
    Maitreyi Narayan, Swetha Jayavelu, Harsh Goel, Joshua R Rosenthal, Gabriel M Aisenberg
    Cureus 2022
  • Insights into Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Central Nervous System Paracoccidioidomycosis: A Comprehensive Review
    Rangel de Sousa Costa, Luiz Celso Hygino da Cruz Jr, Simone Rachid de Souza, Nina Ventura, Diogo Goulart Corrêa
    Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine 2023 Volume 14
  • Seizures and Headaches in a 34-Year-Old Woman With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    Gabriela Figueiredo Pucci, Robson S. Fontes, Robson T. Roque, Vinicius C. Nobrega, Aaron L. Berkowitz
    The Neurohospitalist 2022 12 2

More in this TOC Section

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • Segmentation of Brain Metastases with BLAST
  • NCCT vs. MRI for Brain Atrophy in Acute Stroke
Show more Adult Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire