Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Patel PD,
   2. Chalouhi N,
   3. Atallah E, et al

   . Off-label uses of the Pipeline Embolization Device: a review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 2017;42:E4 doi:10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1742 pmid:28565978

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Lozupone E,
   2. Piano M,
   3. Valvassori L, et al

   . Flow diverter devices in ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg 2018;128:1037–43 doi:10.3171/2016.11.JNS161937 pmid:28387623

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Linfante I,
   2. Mayich M,
   3. Sonig A, et al

   . Flow diversion with Pipeline Embolic Device as treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage secondary to blister aneurysms: dual-center experience and review of the literature. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:29–33 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012287 pmid:27075485

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Ryan RW,
   2. Khan AS,
   3. Barco R, et al

   . Pipeline flow diversion of ruptured blister aneurysms of the supraclinoid carotid artery using a single-device strategy. Neurosurg Focus 2017;42:E11 doi:10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1757 pmid:28565992

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Chan RS,
   2. Mak CH,
   3. Wong AK, et al

   . Use of the Pipeline Embolization Device to treat recently ruptured dissecting cerebral aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2014;20:436–41 doi:10.15274/INR-2014-10042 pmid:25207906

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Cinar C,
   2. Oran I,
   3. Bozkaya H, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of ruptured blister-like aneurysms with special reference to the flow-diverting strategy. Neuroradiology 2013;55:441–47 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1136-y pmid:23322455

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Cerejo R,
   2. Bain M,
   3. John S, et al

   . Flow diverter treatment of cerebral blister aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2017;59:1285–90 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1936-6 pmid:29046918

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Yoon JW,
   2. Siddiqui AH,
   3. Dumont TM, et al

   . Endovascular Neurosurgery Research Group. Feasibility and safety of Pipeline embolization device in patients with ruptured carotid blister aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2014;75:419–29; discussion 429 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000487 pmid:24991709

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Lin N,
   2. Brouillard AM,
   3. Keigher KM, et al

   . Utilization of Pipeline Embolization Device for treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: US multicenter experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:808–15 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011320 pmid:25230839

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. McAuliffe W,
    2. Wenderoth JD

    . Immediate and midterm results following treatment of recently ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:487–93 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2797 pmid:22135131

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Chalouhi N,
    2. Zanaty M,
    3. Whiting A, et al

    . Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2015;76:165–172; discussion 172 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000586 pmid:25549187

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. de Barros Faria M,
    2. Castro RN,
    3. Lundquist J, et al

    . The role of the Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of dissecting intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:2192–95 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2671 pmid:21885721

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Capocci R,
    2. Shotar E,
    3. Di Maria F, et al

    . Delayed treatment (≥5 days) by flow diversion of ruptured blister-like cerebral aneurysms: case series of 8 consecutive patients. Clin Neuroradiol 2020;30:287–96 doi:10.1007/s00062-019-00758-4 pmid:30683969

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Natarajan SK,
    2. Shallwani H,
    3. Fennell VS, et al

    . Flow diversion after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2017;28:375–88 doi:10.1016/j.nec.2017.02.011 pmid:28600012

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Darkwah Oppong M,
    2. Buffen K,
    3. Pierscianek D, et al

    . Secondary hemorrhagic complications in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: when the impact hits hard. J Neurosurg 2019 Jan 25. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.3171/2018.9.JNS182105 pmid:30684947

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Kassell NF,
    2. Torner JC

    . Aneurysmal rebleeding: a preliminary report from the Cooperative Aneurysm Study. Neurosurgery 1983;13:479–81 doi:10.1227/00006123-198311000-00001 pmid:6646375

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Peschillo S,
    2. Miscusi M,
    3. Caporlingua A, et al

    . Blister-like aneurysms in atypical locations: a single-center experience and comprehensive literature review. World Neurosurg 2015;84:1070–79 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2015.05.077 pmid:26074437

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Connolly ES Jr.,
    2. Rabinstein AA,
    3. Carhuapoma JR, et al

    ; Council on Clinical Cardiology. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2012;43:1711–37 doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e3182587839 pmid:22556195

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Spetzler RF,
    2. McDougall CG,
    3. Zabramski JM, et al

    . The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial: 6-year results. J Neurosurg 2015;123:609–17 doi:10.3171/2014.9.JNS141749 pmid:26115467

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Becske T,
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Saatci I, et al

    . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Nelson PK,
    2. Lylyk P,
    3. Szikora I, et al

    . The Pipeline Embolization Device for the Intracranial Treatment of Aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2421 pmid:21148256

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Marosfoi M,
    2. Clarencon F,
    3. Langan ET, et al

    . Acute thrombus formation on phosphorylcholine surface modified flow diverters. J Neuronterv Surg 2018;10:406–11 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013175 pmid:28689183

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Manning NW,
    2. Cheung A,
    3. Phillips TJ, et al

    . Pipeline Shield with single antiplatelet therapy in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: multicentre experience. J NeurontervSurg 2019;11:694–98 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014363 pmid:28689183

    CrossRefPubMed