Trainee Misinterpretations on Pediatric Neuroimaging Studies: Classification, Imaging Analysis, and Outcome Assessment

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Miyakoshi A,
   2. Nguyen QT,
   3. Cohen WA,
   4. et al

   . Accuracy of preliminary interpretation of neurologic CT examinations by on-call radiology residents and assessment of patient outcomes at a level 1 trauma center. J Am Coll Radiol 2009; 6: 864–70

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Walls J,
   2. Hunter N,
   3. Brasher PM,
   4. et al

   . The DePICTORS study: discrepancies in preliminary interpretation of CT scans between on-call residents and staff. Emerg Radiol 2009; 16: 303–08

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Filippi CG,
   2. Schneider B,
   3. Burbank HN,
   4. et al

   . Discrepancy rates of radiology resident interpretations of on-call neuroradiology MR imaging studies. Radiology 2008; 249: 972–79

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Strub WM,
   2. Leach JL,
   3. Tomsick T,
   4. et al

   . Overnight preliminary head CT interpretations provided by residents: locations of misidentified intracranial hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 1679–82

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Wysoki MG,
   2. Nassar CJ,
   3. Koenigsberg RA,
   4. et al

   . Head trauma: CT scan interpretation by radiology residents versus staff radiologists. Radiology 1998; 208: 125–28

   PubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Strub WM,
   2. Leach JL,
   3. Ying J,
   4. et al

   . First year radiology residents not taking call: will there be a difference? Emerg Radiol 2007; 13: 231–35

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Erly WK,
   2. Berger WG,
   3. Krupinski E,
   4. et al

   . Radiology resident evaluation of head CT scan orders in the emergency department. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 23: 103–07
8. 8.↵
   1. Strub WM,
   2. Vagal A,
   3. Tomsick T,
   4. et al

   . Overnight resident preliminary interpretations on CT examinations: should the process continue? Emerg Radiol 2006; 13: 19–23

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Gutmark R,
   2. Halsted MJ,
   3. Perry L,
   4. et al

   . Use of computer databases to reduce radiograph reading errors. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4: 65–68

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Sanchez T,
    2. Stewart D,
    3. Walvick M,
    4. et al

    . Skull fractures vs. accessory sutures: how can we tell the difference? Emerg Radiol 2010; 17: 413–18

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.
    1. Wei SC,
    2. Ulmer S,
    3. Lev MH,
    4. et al

    . Value of coronal reformations in the CT evaluation of acute head trauma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 334–339

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Ringl H,
    2. Schernthaner RE,
    3. Schueller G,
    4. et al

    . The skull unfolded: a cranial CT visualization algorithm for fast and easy detection of skull fractures. Radiology 2010; 255: 553–62

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Kirks DR,
    2. Griscom NT

    1. Robertson RL,
    2. Ball WS,
    3. Barnes PD

    . Skull and brain. In: Kirks DR, Griscom NT . eds. Practical pediatric imaging: diagnostic radiology of infants and children. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1998:65–200
14. 14.↵
    1. Moore MJ,
    2. Vagal AS,
    3. Strub WM,
    4. et al

    . Reducing the gray zone: imaging spectrum of hypoperfusion and hypoxic brain injury in adults. Emerg Radiol 2009; 17: 123–30

    PubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Zan E,
    2. Yousem DM,
    3. Carone M,
    4. et al

    . Second-opinion consultations in neuroradiology. Radiology 2010; 255: 135–41

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Wechsler RJ,
    2. Spettell CM,
    3. Kurtz AB,
    4. et al

    . Effects of training and experience in interpretation of emergency body CT scans. Radiology 1996; 199: 717–20

    PubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Halsted MJ,
    2. Kumar H,
    3. Paquin JJ,
    4. et al

    . Diagnostic errors by radiology residents in interpreting pediatric radiographs in an emergency setting. Pediatr Radiol 2004; 34: 331–36

    CrossRefPubMed